“No-one misses a slice from a cut loaf”

Why men should marry virgins:

“It only takes one …”

(Found here.)

As a girl once said to me, no-one misses a slice from a cut loaf. Even if she has only had one man before you, he may have ruined her for you. And once she has had one, how many others has she had? The fact is, you just don’t know.

I have read credible reports in the Manosphere of men who found their wives had been sexually penetrated by 11, 15, 21 … previous men.

Not a very happy thought to while away the dark early hours of some morning, is it?

The greatest, the very greatest, achievement of Western feminism has been to convince the average man that he is not entitled to a virgin bride.

This has to stop.

I have had a fairly happy 27 year marriage. My one piece of advice to a young man would be: be her first, be her alpha, marry her, make her a wife and a mother.

Afterthought: This probably deserves a full post, but I am reluctant to replace this present post as the top post for a little while, because I think it is an important one. But I wanted to say that a woman is always conniving for you or against you. It is very important to have a woman who is manipulating you for good. I have quoted a comment at the end of this post, on the character of Audrey in the film Metropolitan, in which a critic suggests that Audrey is far more manipulative in her plans for Tom than is obvious on the surface:

“the stars make sapphires of their eyes”

Of course, this is manipulation for a good end. Audrey likes Tom.

But it is in the interests of feminists, and women in general, to deprive men of information. That is why feminists get so hysterical about men demanding virgins. A man who marries a non-virgin is marrying a completely unknown quantity. I have written about this kind of thing previously here. There was a woman, a Catholic “conservative”, who wrote a piece in the UK not long ago that reportedly argued that it was not a priority for husbands to be assured that the children in the home were in fact his. Apparently, it was his duty to just accept whatever God, and his wife’s possible infidelity, sent along. This is pure Team Woman, the inability of even “conservative” women to understand that men have feelings and rights too.

Commenter Aremo made some relevant points at Sunshine Mary’s blog recently. I make a brief answering comment that touches on the issues I raise here.

[21 May 2013. Some relevant discussion at The Orthosphere.]

I have just had someone visit my blog, for the first time, from the British Virgin Islands:

How appropriate!

[31 May 2012: As in Aesop’s fables, a fox without a tail (Mrs Swallow Prior) tells the other foxes to lose theirs too.]

Mrs Swallow Prior explains to the other vixens that not having a tail (or a hymen) is not important:

Some objective evidence that female virginity is valued in many societies:

“Are sexual double standards cross-cultural or only an artifact of modern Western society? Buss presented data from a cross-cultural study across 15 different cultures (n=2,471) that examined the impact of various acts on status and reputation. Results:

Being a virgin and effect on status and reputation: male’s reputation goes down, female’s goes up.”