Posts Tagged ‘politics’

The banality of Hillary Clinton

Somebody imagines a New Yorker cover:

banal.jpg

Note that the “genius” designer spelled Margaret Mead incorrectly. And Dian Fossey.

See if you can find any other errors …

Advertisements

“A Stable Father Prevents the Early Onset of Puberty”

A review article by Connor Murphy:

http://www.xyz.net.au/a-stable-father-prevents-the-early-onset-of-puberty/

” … it stands to reason that children are consciously and subconsciously aware if they are under the care and protection of an adult male, i.e. a patriarch. When they know they are not, they are more stressed as a result.”

IMG_3249

 

Julian Assange, Anti-feminist

21270829_10211928967353538_5859219997483018791_n

Something I wrote about Julian Assange on Facebook today:

“Julian Assange has been anti-feminist for a long time. His experience in Sweden would have confirmed this. He seems to be a right-wing libertarian. He clearly disliked Hillary.

I doubt that lack of vitamin D [in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London] is the issue. It is perfectly possible for someone to espouse his views and ideas on sexual politics and geopolitics and be as sane as most people.

He has an unusual mind and is not your typical progressive.

I understand what drives him because I tend to agree with him.”

I apologise for the rainbow …

 

… banner which has appeared on this blog.

I didn’t put it there. I don’t support gay marriage.

LATER: Apparently this banner was a temporary banner only visible to the blogger. People complained but WordPress were obfuscating the issue. It was some corporate virtue signalling after the US Supreme Court decision. I don’t know why it has suddenly appeared on my blog. If other people can’t see it, good. I hope it goes away altogether.

Why is this offensive to feminists?

I have posted another copy of this recently. Here is one that should be viewable:

I assume that this has upset feminists. I cannot be bothered going to check on their latest tantrum, if that is the case. But I thought it would be worthwhile to dissect why this video would probably drive them to distraction.

I would say it would upset feminists because a) it reminds them that women did not write the great classical music, b) it reminds them that women’s greatest contribution to culture will always be their own clothed (or unclothed) bodies, c) it reminds them that men find slim, nubile women the most appealing and, I suspect too, d) there is a subtle reminder that air blowers, like nearly everything else, were invented by men.

So, it’s a kind of multiple whammy and bound to drive feminists nuts. (More nuts.)

 

“Based Southern Belle”

“Based Southern Belle”.

Pretty little thang with very right-wing opinions.

Two Alt-Rights?

alt-right