Actress Jennifer Lawrence:
27 Feb
Recent Comments
 | fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
| fuzziewuzziebear on There is a hawk |
 | Julian O'Dea on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
| Julian O'Dea on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
| fuzziewuzziebear on better to write |
Julian O'Dea 
Posted by Kentucky Headhunter on February 27, 2018 at 2:48 pm
Just heard that Jennifer Lawrence dropped out of elementary school to pursue her acting career. Which means that the person who has vowed to “fix our democracy” in a year, has the same educational attainment as Jethro Clampett.
Posted by Just don’t objectify her … — Julian O’Dea | Whores and Ale on February 27, 2018 at 2:52 pm
[…] via Just don’t objectify her … — Julian O’Dea […]
Posted by Kentucky Headhunter on February 27, 2018 at 3:38 pm
Oops, Jethro was a Bodine, and nephew to Jed Clampett.
Posted by fuzziewuzziebear on February 27, 2018 at 3:54 pm
I have to wonder how they deal with the dissonance. For the movie, Red Sparrow, she claims that doing nude scenes empowered her while she must still be angry about her private nude pictures being hacked from the cloud in 2014. I can’t be the only one who is getting tired of these contradictions.
Posted by fuzziewuzziebear on February 27, 2018 at 4:54 pm
I am not going to see the movie, but if you are interested in the history behind it, this is a pretty sensational Ukrainian production that should be of interest.
Posted by RichardP on February 28, 2018 at 8:32 pm
No contradiction. The subject is not “showing nude body to the public”. The subject is “who gets to show it?”
“Nobody has the right to show my nude body to the world without my permission” is a statement that makes sense. Or at least it should if you contemplate for a moment your own attitude toward whether you should have the right to control what is yours.
Posted by Bee on March 11, 2018 at 5:20 pm
Strawman.
She is deliberately being a tease and a showoff.
She should not be showing it to anyone but her husband. And, she does not have a husband yet.
Posted by RichardP on February 28, 2018 at 8:49 pm
Also:
From Wikipedia, about JL: “Her films have grossed over $5.5 billion worldwide, and she was the highest-paid actress in the world in 2015 and 2016.”
She did all of this without getting naked (that’s what she said; research that if you must). She has already proven that she has chops. So now, now that she’s chosen to get naked, don’t default to thinking that she is just a pretty, naked lady. She is more than that.
That, more or less, is what she means by “don’t objectify me”. I’ve read what she has said about the issues addressed in this post and my previous post above. I’ve summarized her views on the issues.
Also – she was spotted by a talent scout at age 14. A little past grade school. And kids in acting must be tutored. So her education did not stop just because she entered the biz. A little reading / research will demonstrate that many child actors left school and were tutored on the set.
I’m not defending JL here. I’m defending logic. I’m defending thoughtful comments versus comments devoid of any background information informing them.
Posted by fuzziewuzziebear on March 1, 2018 at 12:10 am
There is something very wrong with all this. She is being allowed to commercialize herself and it is through leveraging men’s libido. Prostitution is more honest.
Posted by Ray Manta on March 4, 2018 at 4:59 pm
https://psmag.com/social-justice/actresses-and-sex-workers-arent-so-different
Actresses were historically not considered much different from whores. 20th century technology was a game changer in that regard since it allowed global distribution, which allowed performers to accumulate disproportionate wealth and power. I believe that in the 21st century technology will reverse this trend by democratizing content creation and that it’s already happening.
Posted by fuzziewuzziebear on March 11, 2018 at 11:25 pm
I think, that with this subject, we have hit a sore spot for men. We have to be tired of being endlessly teased by these women when nothing can come of it. Worse yet, they have managed to make us feel guilty for being teased. It is easier for me to defend myself against these manipulations now that I am aware of it. For a lot of us, it must still be going on beneath consciousness.
Posted by Kentucky Headhunter on March 13, 2018 at 2:45 pm
It’s not uncommon for celebrities or musicians to drop out of school at a young age to fulfill their dreams. While many attend school on the set with a private tutor, Jennifer Lawrence declined all of that and is now one of the biggest actresses on the planet and claims to be “self-educated,”
https://movieweb.com/jennifer-lawrence-middle-school-drop-out-no-diploma/
Posted by Craig on February 27, 2018 at 11:21 pm
She is scantily clad with full makeup mask and her tits out… and she doesn’t want to be objectified. The cognitive dissonance is so loud on this one.
Posted by Julian O'Dea on February 28, 2018 at 12:17 am
I suppose the response would be: if I do it to myself it is “empowering”. But if you notice it in the wrong way, it is “objectification”.
The truth is that women objectify themselves and each other at least as much as men objectify them.
Posted by Ray Manta on March 4, 2018 at 4:36 pm
I suppose the response would be: if I do it to myself it is “empowering”. But if you notice it in the wrong way, it is “objectification”,
That’s women’s solipsism at work along with a large dose of the permissiveness of Western civilization. The end result is they think they can treat their sexuality as if it’s a sharpshooter’s rifle (attracting only the men they find attractive) when it’s really more like a sawed-off shotgun (attracts all men).
Posted by Amfortas on February 28, 2018 at 2:07 am
The video clip you showed tells of its own validity in the first minute, describing John Profumo as British Prime Minister. He was what we would now call the Minister of Defence. But for a voice-over for a video about sex expoinage, we would have to go with the comment of Mandy Rice Davies: “Well, he would say that, wouldn’t he?”
Posted by Julian O'Dea on February 28, 2018 at 2:18 am
fuzziewuzziebear provided it.
Good points.
Posted by Bike bubba on February 28, 2018 at 3:31 pm
Objectified or not, her outfit screams weakness. She’s putting her shoulders forward to press her breasts outward instead of standing up straight, and her makeup is so thick as to function as a shield. She has no freedom of movement without risking her nipples being exposed, and the dress overall flatters her less than a well designed gunny sack.
If that’s feminine strength, give me the so-called “weakness” my wife shows, which is about 100x stronger than this, not to mention 1000x sexier.