What if white men are just smarter?

In an apparently now-deleted tweet, a woman, Lindy W—, wrote something very like:

” … if you think we live in a meritocracy, then by extension you think that white men are naturally better at nearly everything …”

Could this be what is behind the hysterical searching for more and more subtle supposedly structural biases in favour of white men? The alternative – that white men are just smarter on average – is simply too horrible for some people to contemplate.

 

Advertisements

12 responses to this post.

  1. Well, the basis of ‘equality’ demands is envy, and the wish to destroy White males and control them.

    So of course Whites can’t have any of their accomplishments, or their future, be for themselves and by themselves.

    It is this that must be challenged and ended. This envy and coercion masking as a movement for ‘equality’. All it means is: Nobody is better than me, but I may in selected appropriate circumstances be better than anyone else. And on it goes.

    ‘White Supremacy’: just means White people control their lives, their society, their identity and their future as Whites.

    Ending ‘White Supremacy’: just means these SJW’s (and the state) control your life, your future and everything….. and forever.

    I like this quote:

    The concept of envy – the hatred of the superior – has dropped out of our moral vocabulary… The idea that white Christian civilization is hated more for its virtues than its sins doesn’t occur to us, because it’s not a nice idea… Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. And, superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call minorities. Joseph Sobran, April 1997

    Reply

    • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 22, 2016 at 1:53 pm

      I think it is pretty clear that white men, and yellow men, are the best at creating civilisation.

      Attempts to deny this grow increasingly hysterical as the evidence builds up.

      Reply

      • Posted by Jim on January 22, 2016 at 6:02 pm

        “Well, the basis of ‘equality’ demands is envy, and the wish to destroy White males and control them. ”

        Thank you. Somebody said it. As a white male I’m tired of being seen as the ultimate evil and out to destroy everything that is good. The pathetic projection of these Marxist maggots is beyond pathetic.

        ——————
        Julian wrote:

        “I think it is pretty clear that white men, and yellow men, are the best at creating civilisation.

        Attempts to deny this grow increasingly hysterical as the evidence builds up.”

        From what I’ve heard whites have an average IQ of 100. Blacks: 85. If that’s true that is a huge difference and it sure explains why Africa never saw any kind of advanced civilization before white colonialism showed up.

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 22, 2016 at 9:50 pm

        This can be debated endlessly and I am not saying that groups other than white and yellow men are incapable of making contributions to culture.

        But as I like to say, I would not be surprised if China puts a man on Mars. Or France. But I would be astounded if a group of Tanzanian women did it.

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 22, 2016 at 10:22 pm

        I notice in passing that the Motion Picture Academy in America has now promised to raise the prominence of people other than white men. At least I think that is what the report said.

        This underscores the problem with assumptions about equality. If the real world does not conform to the assumptions, somehow the real world is at fault. Always, this is the assumption. This error itself is not a problem, until it starts to try to “correct” what it sees as something wrong. If error has influence, and can influence public policy, it can never change reality, but it can do a lot of damage by trying.

        A person like Lindy W—, whom I quoted above, is never going to admit that women are not the same as men, and as mentally gifted as men in every way. So she will go on believing desperately that the only reason men have done so well is because we somehow cheated. She will be unhappy, whereas a more traditional woman would not care that much, and her unhappiness will be spread and can become toxic to society.

      • Posted by Jim on January 23, 2016 at 2:25 am

        What they’re seeking is just equality of outcomes. IOW, if the results don’t match their worldview they try to make it work by force. So instead of just realizing their error they just double down on their stupidity. It’s what the Left has always done over here. And it’s only getting worse. Although it is creating more and more rebels against it.

        They never learn.

        “A person like Lindy W—”

        She’s the type of woman with penis envy. I’ve even had women admit that to my face. I remember the first time I it heard as a teenager. It was shocking to my naive young mind at the time.

        I also remember to having a few that finally gave up their envy and became submissive (to an extreme degree) admit to me that was their problem early on. They said were MUCH happier after dropping it and “becoming what they’re supposed to be” (the words quotes are their words not mine).

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 23, 2016 at 3:49 am

        Yes, that has been my observation. Some women ARE incorrigible but most will submit if the circumstances are right. And be content.

        Or as content as a human can be. There is no ideal way to live one’s life. Women especially don’t seem naturally to find lasting contentment.

        Honestly, the best thing a man can do to make a woman happy is to tell her she is happy because she should be, having him. This is why “game” works. It makes the girl feel lucky to be with the man.

        The best solution to penis envy is accepting femininity. But that is the last thing girls are taught today.

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 25, 2016 at 12:50 am

        I am not sure the cited article below quite belongs here, but it is interesting. I do think masculine and traditionalist views are best acquired naturally as one grows up.

        His remarks are a bit unclear but they shed light on one thing that is not often recognised – that so-called chauvinistic men often like women more than progressive men. I think the reason is that traditional men are not too surprised and disappointed when women behave like women. Progressive men always seem to expect more.

        http://blog.jim.com/culture/believing-in-male-supremacy-will-make-you-more-attractive-to-women/

        I went to a fairly liberal Catholic boys school, for the time, but I remember one of our Religion books stating that men were in some respects superior to women. I have often wondered what the girls were being taught in those days.

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 28, 2016 at 1:55 pm

        A quote from the blog post cited:

        “If you don’t know the red pill, but believe that women should submit and obey, you will naturally act red pill. If you do know the red pill, but believe women are equals, then doing what gets you laid will seem artificial, unnatural, repugnant, and immoral, and women will seem bad when such behavior works.”

      • Posted by Jim on January 28, 2016 at 11:03 pm

        “If you don’t know the red pill, but believe that women should submit and obey, you will naturally act red pill. If you do know the red pill, but believe women are equals, then doing what gets you laid will seem artificial, unnatural, repugnant, and immoral, and women will seem bad when such behavior works.”

        True. I don’t see how anyone can be red pill and believe in equality at the same time. That’s like wanting to eat your cake and still have it.

      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on January 28, 2016 at 11:27 pm

        There are a couple of problems. One is that nobody really agrees on what equality means. The other is that men rapidly conceded ground by agreeing that women are equal to men. I think one could argue that they are not (and a lot of women would tacitly agree.)

        Women are basically specialised to attract men and bear children. This is bound to put limitations on them, both physical and mental.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: