Three women marry each other

Three Lesbian Women In Massachusetts “Marry” Each Other:


The really interesting question is where they will get a triple-headed dildo.


14 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Jim on May 4, 2015 at 7:29 am

    We all know that lesbian relationships are the most violent. How long do you think it will be before it starts? lol. Glad they’re marrying each other. This will save some poor men from a lot of agony.


    • Jim, yes. But I am mostly amused by imagining their bedroom antics.

      I don’t find “girl on girl” sexy. Just funny. Or, in this case, “girl on girl on girl”.


      • Posted by Jim on May 4, 2015 at 2:45 pm

        I hear ya Julian. It’s definitely comical.

      • Posted by Jim on May 5, 2015 at 3:48 am

        BTW, lesbian relationships are THE most violent. What are the odds these lesbos are going to be assaulting each other soon?

    • “…This will save some poor men from a lot of agony.”

      SO true! There are at least three men somewhere who don’t know how lucky they are.
      And the funny thing is that most women are so puzzled why the marriage rate keeps dropping and the numbers of MGTOW keep rising. Funny, huh?

      *** I just had a thought: what happens when one or more of them want a divorce?
      And how far off is legalized polygamy?
      And after that, legal incest? And after that, legal pedophilia? And after that, legal beastiality? ***

      Makes me glad that I’m MGTOW.


  2. Posted by Dash Riprock on May 4, 2015 at 12:56 pm

    The same arguments for gay “marriage” that homosexuals and their fellow travelers are making are frankly the very same ones that we will now begin to hear from the advocates of polygamy. Frankly the polygamists probably have the stronger argument as they can appeal to the historical record. And have no doubt that those who seek to sanctity incestuous unions are warming up in the bullpen. As all my nice friends say to me after all if people love each other…………
    Following this train wreck to its logical conclusion is frightening. The descent to barbarism is accelerating at a rapid pace at least in the white English speaking world and in Western Europe. Is it any coincidence that these are the lands that were once Protestant. I think not.


    • Posted by Julian O'Dea on May 4, 2015 at 1:19 pm

      Yes, I do think there is a trajectory from Protestantism to militant secularism with all its attendant political correctness and religiosity about homosexuals and so on. Whereas even decadent Catholic countries tend to retain their firm preference for “Vive La Difference!”. The resistance from ordinary people to “gay marriage” in France recently was quite strong.

      Catholicism has generally known what do with women. Wives, mothers, nuns, workers. Women’s role in Protestantism is more problematic.

      Some cases like Quebec do not fit this trend. It has become highly socially liberal I believe.

      Pope Francis shows signs of liberal sympathies but he retains his concern that the sexes complement each other. The missing ingredient in his recipe for marriage to thrive is, I think, his sentimentality about women and his neglect of the leading role of husbands.

      I remain optimistic that trends are not destiny, that society can learn from its errors, and that laughter and common sense help.

      In researching this post, I watched for the first time a video of women using a double headed dildo. It really is the most absurdly degrading practice. No doubt Lesbians do other things too, but some cleansing humour is often the best response.


      • Posted by Julian O'Dea on May 4, 2015 at 11:33 pm

        It occurs to me that their unnatural nude wriggling together is like a punishment from Dante’s Inferno.

      • Of course the girls in the double-headed dildo videos are probably not real Lesbians, just porn actresses trying to make ends meet (so to speak).

      • ”Catholicism has generally known what do with women. Wives, mothers, nuns, workers. Women’s role in Protestantism is more problematic.”

        Reformed Protestantism knows that the role of women are to be wives mothers and workers as outlined in the word. However the abolition of nunneries probably led to unmarriagable women to become feminist activists instead.

      • I have often felt that among the biggest losers after Vatican II were the nuns. Priests retained their essential role, but women religious were no longer so important, partly because of the new emphasis on the “priesthood of [all] the faithful”. Nuns had lost much of their distinctive function.

        With less of a defined role, nuns went feral in recent decades, providing evidence for two propositions: that women generally make mediocre theological thinkers and that nuns need to be under an effective masculine hierarchy.

  3. Posted by Slumlord on May 4, 2015 at 9:16 pm

    Since anal seems so popular these days I reckon they could daisy chain. No need for “triple heads”.


    • Posted by Julian O'Dea on May 4, 2015 at 10:08 pm

      I am not sure what “daisy chain” means. I am no expert in these areas. However I found out many years ago that Lesbians are very keen on anal. Beats me why. That really seems to miss the whole point.


  4. This is not marriage. ITs just pretend. A demand for the status of marriage without having any interest in it–or ability to sustain one. Gimme, gimme, gimme.

    Hey!!! I’m an elephant—look, see my trunk!!! I believe I’m an elephant–so I am one.

    So there.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: